|
The purpose of this section is to publish commentaries (or
excerpts in some cases) from unpublished or previously published works on
issues that affect the democratic nations in the Atlantic Community. Atlantic Community History, Background Sten
Rynning review of NATO, the European
Union and the Atlantic Community, published in International Affairs ( Nicole Renvert
review of NATO, the European Union and the Atlantic Community published in The International Spectator,
2003. NATO,
the European Union and the Atlantic Community: The Transatlantic Bargain
Reconsidered by Stanley R. Sloan, European
Proposals for a New Atlantic Community, [PDF document] Congressional Research Service
report 95-374 S, Table of Participation in
Euro-Atlantic Security Institutions [updated April 26, 2009] Heiko Borchert, Strengthening Europe’s
Security Architecture: Where Do
We Stand? Where Should We Go? NATO in the 21st
Century, Senator William V. Roth, Jr., Special Presidential
Report to the US Policy, Iraq, Afghanistan, and NATO’s Future Security in an Uncertain
World: A Canadian Perspective on
NATO’s New Strategic Concept, Report
produced by a special working group organized by the Canadian Conference of Defence Associations Institute and the Canadian Defence
and Foreign Affairs Institute.
Released March 24, 2010. The
Netherlands and NATO’s New Strategic Concept: Observations and Policy
Recommendations from the Netherlands Atlantic Association. In May 2009, the Netherlands Atlantic
Association organized a 2-day experts conference to
examine the implications for Dutch foreign and defense policy of a new
strategic concept for NATO. The
session’s moderator, Stanley R. Sloan, was asked to prepare a report
drawing on the session and making recommendations for Dutch policy. This is the draft of the report that
was presented to the Foreign Ministry of The Netherlands. “Pondering NATO’s Future,” Stanley R. Sloan, International Herald Tribune, March 5, 2009. This opinion piece suggests that, in the context of the 60th anniversary summit, NATO leaders should examine closely some popular assumptions surrounding the alliance. “NATO and US Interests after 60 Years: Challenges and Opportunities”, Stanley R. Sloan, Keynote address to the 13th Annual Military Ball, in support of the Pierre Claeyssens Veterans Museum and Library, Santa Barbara, California, November 8, 2008. “How and Why Did NATO Survive Bush Doctrine”, Stanley R. Sloan, Report by the NATO College Research Directorate, October 2008. This report analyses how and why the transatlantic relationship survived the crisis brought on by the policies and attitudes of the first administration of George W. Bush and then suggests what the experience might suggest about the future of the alliance. “NATO’s
Uncertain Future: Is Demography
Destiny?, Jeffrey Simon, Strategic
Forum, No. 236, Institute for National Strategic Studies, National
Defense University, October 2008.
This report questions whether NATO will be able to sustain collective
military operations and political unity in the face of changing demographics
of NATO countries. “Can NATO
Survive Afghanistan?,” Swords and Ploughshares,” August
2008. This collection of articles
by Stanley R. Sloan, Ryan C. Hendrickson, Paul F. Diehl and Edward A. Kolodziej, edited by Matthew A. Rosenstein, examines the
significant challenges facing NATO as it conducts its first mission outside
the Euro-Atlantic arena in its nearly sixty-year history. NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, “Beyond the Bucharest Summit,” Presentation to the German Marshall Fund Brussels Forum, March 15, 2008. Stephen J. Flanagan, Leo G. Michel, James J. Przystup
and John A. Cope, “Adapting Alliances and Partnerships,” Chapter
7 in Strategic Challenges, America’s
Global Security Agenda, National Defense University Press and Potomac
Books, Inc., 2008. NATO College Research Directorate, Dr. Karl-Heinz
Kamp, Director, “NATO before Bucharest: The Alliance at the Crossroads,”
Summary Conference Findings, January 2008. Stanley
R. Sloan, “NATO Beyond Russia: Building a New Foundation for
Transatlantic Relations,” speaking notes for a presentation at the 11th
annual Russia-NATO conference at the St. Petersburg (Russia) State
University, School of International Affairs, 16 February 2007. Marten
van Heuven, “The Future of the Atlantic
Alliance,” speaking notes for a presentation at Middlebury
College, 29 January 2007. Kristin Archik, “The United States and Europe: Current
Issues,” Congressional
Research Service Report for Congress, Updated Marten
van Heuven, “The Global Setting for
Transatlantic Relations.” Speaking Notes for a Lecture at Middlebury College,
Marten
van Heuven, “Rethinking the
Transatlantic Relationship in the 21st
Century,” Speaking Notes for a Lecture at Stanley
R. Sloan, Robert G. Sutter and Casimir A. Yost, The
Use of U.S. Power: Implications for U.S. Interests, Institute for the Study of Diplomacy, Stanley
R. Sloan presentation at Nobel Institute, Oslo, Norway, Louis R. Golino, “Iraq is chance for U.S. to fix its
relations,”
The Washington Times, Stanley
R. Sloan, “Challenges to the Transatlantic Relationship”, In the National Interest, Stanley R. Sloan: Notes for presentation at German
Council on Foreign Relations, February 10, 2003 Wolfgang
Buecherl, “NATO’s Course”,
Center for Applied Policy Research, Louis R. Golino, "NATO
role in Iraq vital: U.S. Likely to Rely on Alliance for Postwar
Peacekeeping,"
The Washington Times,
Stanley Sloan and Peter van Ham, What future
for NATO?,
Centre for European Reform Working Paper, October 2002. Louis R. Golino, NATO seen adapting to
terror war; Alliance used only sparingly after attacks, The Washington
Times, Louis R. Golino, Time to Thank Europe for its
Help on Terrorism, Global Beat Syndicate, Karen Donfried, Highwire Act Across the Atlantic, Louis R. Golino,
War on Terror
Affects Role of EU’s Future . General U.S.-European Relations Political NEW!! “Faith,
Freedom and Fundamentalism:
Challenges to Transatlantic Relations and Beyond,” Keynote address
by Stanley R. Sloan to the “International Affairs Conference on
Religion and International Politics:
Now and Into the Future,” Star Island, Isles of Shoals, New
Hampshire, July 20, 2008. Karsten
Voigt, “Religion is the wild card in transatlantic relations,”
with commentary by Stanley R. Sloan, “We should be intolerant of
intolerance,” Europe’s World, Summer 2006. Stanley
R. Sloan, “All the president’s truths,” International Herald Tribune, Stanley R. Sloan,
“How Does Religion Affect Relations between America and Europe?”
EuroFuture, Winter 2005. Stanley R. Sloan and Heiko
Borchert, “Europe, U.S. Must Rebalance Soft,
Hard Power, Defense
News, Robert Kagan, Power and Weakness, Policy Review, June-July 2002. Ivo
H. Daalder, Are the
United States and Europe heading for divorce?, International Affairs, Summer 2001
(included here with author’s permission) Simon
Serfaty, “The Economic/financial NEW!! NATO Report on Defense Expenditures,
19 February 2009. Felix Rohatyn, “For ‘New
America’, a fresh Atlantic Alliance,” International Herald Tribune, May 11, 2004. Joseph P. Quinlan,
“Drifting Apart of Growing Together? The Primacy of the Transatlantic
Economy,”
Center for Transatlantic Relations, March 2003 (PDF file). C. Fred Bergsten,
The
Transatlantic Century,
as published in the Washington Post, NATO-EU Relations (ESDI/CESDP) NEW!! “Birthing
Athena, The Uncertain Future of European Security and Defense Policy,”
Christopher S. Chivvis, Focus stratégique
n. 5, Security Studies Center, Institut Français des Relations Internationales,
March 2008. Heiko
Borchert and Karina Forster, “Energy Infrastructure and EU-NATO
Cooperation,” Security Europe, March 2007. www.seceur.info Zacharias
Giakoumis, “ EU-NATO
Relations after the Riga Summit”,
speaking notes for a panel presentation at the 16th
Economic Forum in Krynica, Poland, 8 September
2006. Louis R. Golino, "NATO
role in Iraq vital: U.S. Likely to Rely on Alliance for Postwar
Peacekeeping,"
The Washington Times,
November 18, 2002, page A19. U.S. – CREST, Future Military Coalitions, The Transatlantic Challenge, September 2002. Robert E. Hunter, The
European Security and Defense Policy, NATO’s Companion – or
Competitor?, RAND National Defense Research Institute, 2002. Stanley R. Sloan, Opinion article
entitled "The U.S. and Europe Need New Marriage Vows" originally
published in the Wall Street Journal Europe, February 21, 2001. Louis R. Golino, "EU military endorsed Rapid-reaction force
would add to influence, study says" Washington Times; Washington, D.C.;
Apr 8, 2001 Stanley R. Sloan, “The United States and European
Defence” (Chaillot Papers, No. 39) http://www.weu.int/institute/chaillot/chai39e.pdf Francois Heisbourg et. al., “European Defence: Making It Work”, (Chaillot
Papers, No. 42) http://www.weu.int/institute/chaillot/chai42e.pdf Kori Schake, “EU Should Duplicate NATO Assets,”
CER Bulletin, June/July 2001
http://www.cer.org.uk/n5publicatio/bulletin.html Jolyon Howorth, “European integration and defence: the ultimate
challenge?” Maartje Rutten
(compilation), “From St-Malo to Nice: European defence - core Bosnia and Kosovo RAND, European Contributions
to Operation Allied Force:
Implications for Transatlantic Cooperation ; report summary. Transatlantic Military/Industrial Cooperation CSIS Report, “The Future of the
Transatlantic Defense Community,” January 2003. Burkard Schmitt (ed.), Between
cooperation and competition: the transatlantic defence market (Chaillot
Papers, No. 44) http://www.weu.int/institute/chaillot/chai44e.pdf U.S. – CREST, Future
Military Coalitions, The Transatlantic Challenge, September 2002. Defense spending, force structure and capabilities NEW!! NATO Report on Defense Expenditures,
19 February 2009. Robert Hunter and George Joulwan,
Co-Chair, C. Richard Nelson, Project Director and Rapporteur, New
Capabilities: Transforming NATO Forces, Atlantic Council of the United States, September
2002. NATO and EU Enlargement Leo Michel,
“NATO-EU Cooperation in Operations,” Research Paper, Academic Research Branch, NATO
College, Rome, Italy, February 2007. Vladimir Bilcik, The
Emergence of the CESDP and the state of the transatlantic relations: the
perspective of Central European candidate states for EU membership (Occasional paper published by the
Austrian Institute for European Security, January 2002) Phillip H. Gordon and James B.
Steinberg, NATO
Enlargement: Moving Forward
(Brookings Institution
Policy Brief) William Hopkinson, Enlargement: A New NATO (Chaillot Papers, No. 49) Ambassador Andras
Simonyi, “Hungary in NATO -- after two years of membership,” Thomas S. Szayna, “NATO Enlargement 2000-2015, Implications
for Defense Planning,” RAND Research Brief, RB-62 (2001). Site has link to full report
summarized in this research brief.
http://www.rand.org/publications/RB/RB62/ Christina V. Balis, Editor, Enlargement: A Priority for the European Union,
Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, D.C., May
2001. http://www.csis.org/europe/pubs/enlargement.pdf
|
|
|
