Book reviews and Notes

The Transatlantic Alliance under

Review

Nicole Renvert*

* Nicole Renvert is Director of the Transatlantic Project, Division of International Relations,

Bertelsmann Foundation, Gütersloh.

recensione.qxd 03/09/03 14.55 Pagina 1


The International Spectator

3/2003

 

NATO, the European Union, and the Atlantic

community : the transatlantic bargain recon-

sidered / Stanley R. Sloan. - Lanham,

Maryland : America by Rowman &

Littlefield Publishers, c2002. - 304 p. -

ISBN 0742517594 ; ISBN 0742517608

(pbk)

 

Defending Europe : the EU, NATO and the

quest for European autonomy / edited by

Jolyon Howorth and John T.S. Keeler.

- New York : Palgrave Macmillan,

2003. - 247 p. - ISBN 140396114X

 

The new order of international security

structures is faced with challenges that

require not only a thorough analysis, but

a rethinking of the existing instruments

of security and international security

policy. These two books successfully

take on this rather ambitious project

with sound arguments and even deliver

something like a catalogue of strategic

suggestions.

 

Whereas Stanley Sloan focuses primarily

on the development of NATO’s archi-

tecture of security and its relevance as

an important platform for transatlantic

relations, the authors of Defending Europe

provide a broad, European-based analy-

sis as they chart the ESDI’s arduous path

and the new questions provoked by the

eastern expansion of the EU and

NATO.

 

Both books are highly read-

able, well-researched and analytically

cogent, making them ideal textbooks for

the study of these issues. They are sure

to be popular within both the interna-

tional relations and academic communi-

ties.

 

Stanley Sloan’s underlying thesis is

that, through NATO, the transatlantic

community was able to create a politi-

cally and militarily unique foundation

for interaction that permitted the coor-

dination of European and American

interests via the necessary “deals and

bargains”. NATO’s role is therefore

much more than a political-military

alliance. As Sloan convincingly asserts,

 

Page 2

148 The Atlantic Alliance under Review

NATO, for all its cool and calculated

pragmatism in the name of national

interests, is at its core a community

“with roots in the hearts as in the minds

of the partners”.

 

The end of the Cold War as well as

the new threats posed by international

terrorism and weapons of mass destruc-

tion have forced this instrument of inter-

national security as well as other securi-

ty organisations to face the difficult

prospect of reconsolidation and the

drafting of a new transatlantic contract.

The bases for negotiations of such a treaty

are without doubt altered by the over-

whelming hegemonial power of the US.

Because objectives and priorities have

changed, the transfer of existing instru-

ments and policies to this new phase of

international cooperation is bound to be

problematic. The resultant imbalance,

which is sure to be further accentuated by

the challenge of international terrorism,

can be brought into balance only through

a reiteration and development of common

values. Sloan argues that in the long run,

it is in both American and European inter-

ests to reform existing instruments of

security policy to accommodate the new

conditions.

 

In the US, it is now widely recognised

that the strengthening of European

instruments of defence and security is

essential to the new order of interna-

tional security and that the Europeans

must assume greater responsibility in

leadership. Sloan is correct to argue that

this would embolden the EU pillars of

government while improving inter-insti-

tutional cooperation between NATO

and the EU. The events of 11 September

have created a new momentum in such

strategic discussions because questions

of how to confront international terror-

ism and the effects thereof have exposed

numerous fissures in the façade of a

security architecture undergoing a diffi-

cult process of consolidation and

reform. According to Sloan, what

remains vital is the political will to

meaningfully employ and therefore

strengthen NATO as an instrument of

international security policy and to

prompt Europeans to overcome their

“capability gaps”.

 

Variations of this argument are put

forth by the authors of the equally well-

researched and substantiated articles in

Defending Europe. Certainly, the goal of

European autonomy in security policy

has turned out to be a prolonged and

laborious process. Yet, as the authors in

this collection assert, Europeans and

Americans continue to be dependent

upon one another because both must

build upon their common values to cre-

ate a global security order and processes

of democraticisation if they are to meet

the threats posed to communities of

nation states. The authors claim con-

vincingly that despite all the obstacles

ballyhooed during the unilateralism vs.

autonomy debate in transatlantic rela-

tions, a coordinated and goal-oriented

European security and foreign policy

would lead to the strengthening of the

Atlantic Alliance. Regardless of all the

tension put on the transatlantic structure

recently, the US and Europe will remain

each other’s most important partner.

 

Both books offer more than quick

glances at the difficulties in reshaping

the security architecture on both sides

of the Atlantic. They look closely at the

recensione.qxd 03/09/03 14.55 Pagina 148


Page 3

Nicole Renvert 149

complexities of such a project, mapping

out realistic future scenarios and offering

potential plans.

 

The one weakness that both books

share is the timing of their publication.

The Iraq debate, which continues to

strain transatlantic relations and has pro-

voked a deep identity crisis in the

process of inner-European unification,

finds no mention in either book, with

the unfortunate result that they run the

risk of seeming anachronistic, even

though they are nothing of the sort.

 

Both books make for good reading and

are recommended to those who wish to

further their understanding of contem-

porary transatlantic relations. Of partic-

ular interest in both are the strategic

suggestions which call for a future-ori-

ented policy on both sides of the

Atlantic and the creation of options at

political turning points.

recensione.qxd 03/09/03 14.55 Pagina 149